Biblical-Based Science

Sub-Topic: Electrons are Unique

  As a basis for understanding electrons, consider that they function within a unique environment of what I refer to as Class I and Class II letter-like particles. This is basically a spiritual environment of "light" particles which are sub-sub-atomic in size (sub²-atomic). This environment contains particles which are magnitudes smaller than an atom and substantially smaller than the commonly understood sub-atomic realm.

Historically, and under the discipline of physics - this spiritual environment might be considered to be part of the ether (also spelled as aether); so, is a major component of the unseen realm. From a biblical stance, you can see my basis of reference here.

Electrons function within an environment consisting of heterogeneous particle-clouds of which their primary constituents are that of Class I & II letter-like particles. It's these particles which hold both the intelligence and spiritual aspect inside atomic-like structures.

From a biological stance, I've found that the most straight-forward way to describe varying ratios between these two classes of particles, is by using the words "intelligence gradient". In order to wrap your head around certain concepts, you might first consider reading Lawrention's Spiritual University.

Under the discipline of physics, electrons are fundamental and stable particles. From this stance, they cannot be broken down any further. From an observational standpoint this may be true; however - please humor me for a moment and allow me to explain.

What I'm about to reveal herein doesn't change an electron's mass or its elemental charge of -1. In fact, it reinforces some of its well-understood characteristics. Characteristics which include the electron's magnetic-moment as well as its varying energy-states (referring here to quantum states).

Under the electron's hood, are particle-like sub-forces which "glue" it together. For simplicity's sake, I will refrain from going down the path of explaining what this glue actually is, as that's for another day. For the time being, perhaps the best way to explain this glue - is that it's like a primordial seed.

These primordial seeds are used within a host of other particles as well, and not reserved for just electrons. They are common to a number (if not most) of the standard-model particles within physics. I believe that these primordial seeds manifest themselves through the detection of quarks.

Swinging about the perimeter of every electron is a plurality of the minuscule sub²-atomic letter-like particles. These particles are a homogeneous mix of Class I & II particles. The electron's environment occurs within a sea of these sub²-atomic particles.

The electron looks similar to that of a flexible and very wobbly wagon wheel; and having the letter-like particles rotating about its perimeter. The center of an electron is its “glue”. As the electron spins, it’s the letter-like particles sticking to its perimeter which creates the bulk of its mass. The electron continually oscillates within itself, as well as within its sub²-atomic environment. Due to its inherent vibrational and dynamic character - it continuously attracts and releases the substantially smaller sub²-atomic letter-like particles.

When an electron becomes “full” of these letter-like particles, it is basically saturated of both mass and energy. I believe that at the peak of this saturation point is when it experiences its "magnetic moment". A particle's magnetic moment can be experimentally verified.

Once it reaches its saturation point it proceeds to relax. At this stage, the electron doesn’t attract any more sub²-atomic letter-like particles. During its relaxed state, its continual spinning motion discards any loosely-bound letter-like particles and they become momentarily free (free until they are once again attracted by another particle). Once the electron's relaxed state is done, its cycle resumes; once again it attracts letter-like particles.

I believe that electrons quickly oscillate between a fully-relaxed and fully-saturated state. As an analogy.... consider that this change-of-state is their breathing mechanism. So, with each breath - an electron inhales part of its environment and then expels part of its environment. As a consequence, electrons continually churn up the localized sub²-atomic sea. If this was a card game, I would say that these electrons serve as a means to continually shuffle the deck of sub²-atomic letter-like particles.

It's the Class I particles (versus class II) which are the most energetic and likewise - the most intelligent. They typically lead chemical reactions. Notably, these Class I particles can be considered as the primary constituent of valence electrons. Whereby, in that respect - the focus is not upon an atom's nucleus, but its perimeter.

Size-wise and mass-wise, Class I & II particles are quite similar. Nonetheless, since each class was created by two vastly different processes, there are certain characteristics which continue to be dissimilar.

Since every electron is capable of having a differing ratio of Class I & II particles, all electrons are unique. From our human vantage point, electrons tend to assume characteristics garnered by their most-recent experience (or environment).

Sub-Topic: Class I and Class II Letter-Like Particles

Unbeknownst to secular science, it is the relationship between Class I and Class II letter-like particles which gives us colour. These are perhaps the most  fundamental and primordial particles of all; at least concerning our present universe and matter which we can both see and touch. The basis of these two fundamental groups of particles comes from a biblical stance; some of which you can see here. Within the book of Genesis these two classes of particles are referred to as "Light".

I believe that these particles are many times smaller than those currently understood within the realm of physics; including that of neutrinos. For this reason, I refer to them as being sub-sub-atomic in size. I gather that these Class I & II letter-like particles make up a substantial part of all electromagnetic fields and are the reason as to why we can experience a full electromagnetic-spectrum.

From a secular standpoint - it's primarily due to these particles' energy that differentiates the two classes. The Class I group holds a significantly greater amount of energy than those of Class II; regardless that both classes are similar in size. Another way of conceptualizing the difference between these two classes, is consider that Class I particles are much more efficient within any given environment than that of Class II's.

Particles understood by science are often-times a complementary mix between between these two classes.

Examples of particles heavily based upon Class I's are listed below.

• Valence electrons.
• Electrons within the highest quantum-state or states.
• Photons comprised of bright-white light.
• Photons emitted through ionizing radiation.

By combining Class II particles with those of Class I, results in varying intensities of light which we interpret as distinct colours. The capability of having photons and electrons carrying varying energy-states - is a direct result of differing ratios of  underlying Class I & II particles.

Under the science of biology - there are a number of examples where the underlying mix between between these two classes comes to "light".

• Depending upon the underlying ratio of Class I & II particles, the primary "currency of energy" (ATP) can can be skewed one way or another. This is a fine-tuning mechanism enabling the currency of classical molecular ATP to be either fractionally raised or lowered. So energy-wise, ATP molecules don't necessarily all have to be equivalent. 
• Electrons of the radical element Fluorine contain a very high ratio of Class I particles; higher than that of oxygen.
• Monocytes (white-blood-cells) of the immune system contain a high ratio of Class I particles.
• I believe that stem-cells also contain a high ratio of Class I particles.

Using monocytes and stem-cells as prime examples, I like to refer to their underlying ratio of Class I & II particles as an "intelligence gradient". I find that this term intertwines nicely within the science of biology.

Within the book of Genesis it tells us that we should all be eating our greens. The colour green represents a specific ratio of these two fundamental classes of matter. Significantly, the colour green is midway through the visible-light spectrum.

Green represents food that's neither ripe nor dead and is still in the process of growing. Biologically important - a food's colour is more fundamental in nature than the vitamins and minerals which we often-times use to evaluate them.

Sub-Topic: Practical Aspects Regarding the Breath-of-Life

Please understand that God’s gift of the Breath-of-Life, was not only required for the brain’s first steps of physical development, but for our conscious identity to arise as well.

From what I understand, this Breath of Life is basically a comparatively dense and heavy particle which serves as an interface between two realms. For simplicity, I will use an analogy to describe its function.

For this analogy, I believe that the breath-of-life works similar to that of a tuning fork which continually vibrates at a certain frequency. The power-source for this “tuning fork” is obtained through a universal energy-constant. In other words, a contiguous backdrop of energy.

As I research physical constructs, perhaps an acceptable manner of describing this backdrop of energy - is through the theoretical-concept of negative mass. Think of this negative mass as being a particle-based colourless fluid and one which is normally attracted to common-mass objects.

This tuning-fork analogy for the Breath of Life, serves as a bridge between common-mass atomic structures and the backdrop of negative-mass particles.

Picture the fixed end of the tuning fork being held firmly in place by negative-mass particles, and having its free end vibrating and interacting with common-mass atomic structures. In this respect, energy is transferred from the fixed end of the tuning fork to its vibrating end. Notably, there is a continual flow of heat-energy travelling in the opposite direction as well.

Similar to a metallic heat-sink, the difference in thermal-conductivity between common-mass and negative-mass.... ensures that energy flows from the vibrating end (the one which reacts with atomic structures) to the fixed end (the opposite end which is held by negative mass).

So, this Breath of Life serves as a bridge between one type of matter and another. The heat energy from common-mass particles that's transferred backwards through the breath-of-life and towards its fixed end - gets dissipated through an invisible sea of negative-mass particles.

Sub-Topic: Stem Cell Action

Instead of explaining the conventionally-understood lineage of stem cells, I will leave you with an impression as to how they may function. The Lord led me to this word superposition. It's a common term under the umbrella of particle-physics.

In brief, superposition simply states that particles can be in multiple states (quantum states) at the same time, but can only be observed through a single state.

If we now correlate this concept to stem cells, I believe that it merely infers that stem cells are multifaceted. From this stance, a quick selection (a certain external force) is all that’s required for a particular stem-cell to fixate upon a specific characteristic state. So basically, this selection which is triggered by an external event - forecasts a particular lineage of cells.

The neurological precursor-cells (NPCs) which populate the inside of the neural-tube, might be considered as being undefined and unrefined cells. Although their underlying structure is quite complex; as an NPC - any observed functionality is comparatively crude and subdued.

It is the transference of energy (sound) within the neural-tube which brings NPCs to life, and morphs them into stem-cells for future growth of the central nervous system.